Classification
# of variables | # of modes | # of jumps |
---|---|---|
4 | 2-3 | 1-4 |
Type | Continuous dynamics | Guards & Invariants | Resets |
---|---|---|---|
hybrid | non-polynomial | linear polynomial | identity |
Download
Flow* Strategy I | glucose_control_I |
Flow* Strategy II | glucose_control_II |
Flow* Strategy III | glucose_control_III |
Model description
We study the “minimal model” defined in [1-3] for the dynamics of glucose and insulin interaction in the blood system. It is described by the following ODE.
wherein are constant parameters whose typical values are
min
,
min
and
min
U
L. The values of
and
are the basal values of plasma glucose concentration and free plasma insulin concentration respectively, and they are given by
mmol L
,
U L
. The constant
is the insulin distribution volume, and the value of
denotes the fractional disappearance rate of insulin. We take their values as
L and
min
. The remaining parameters are variables, we give their explanations as below.
![]() |
the difference of plasma glucose concentration |
![]() |
the free plasma insulin concentration |
![]() |
the insulin concentration in an interstitial chamber |
![]() |
the rate of infusion of exogeneous glucose |
![]() |
the rate of infusion of exogeneous insulin |
We use the formulation given in [4] for the rate of insulin infusion, and consider three different strategies for the insulin delivery rate
.
Strategy I is proposed in [5].
The rate is
U h
when
mmol L
,
and it is U h
when
mmol L
.
If is in the range from
to
mmol L
, we use
U h
which is a linear transition between the rates
and
mmol L
.
Strategy II is taken from [6], it is similar to Strategy I but considers the rates and
mmol L
.
That is, we set U h
when
mmol L
,
and U h
when
mmol L
.
For the case that is between
and
mmol L
,
is defined by
.
In order to better stabilize the glucose level, a more sophisticated control strategy is presented in [6]. We call it Strategy III. The controller reads the value of in the beginning of every
hours and do the following job.
If mmol L
, then we use the input rate
U min
.
Otherwise is set to be the linear form
U min
.
Reachability settings
We consider the initial condition ,
, and
under all control strategies.
Results
An over-approximation computed by Flow* for Strategy I is shown below. The time horizon is :
Similarly, we show the figures of the overapproximations computed by Flow* for Strategy II and Strategy III.
References
[1] R. Bergman, Y. Ider, C. Bowden, C. Cobelli. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. In The American Journal of Physiology, volume 236, pages 667-677, The American Physiological Society, 1979. [2] R. Bergman, L. Phillips, C. Cobelli. Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and
1991. [5] D. Chisholm, E. Kraegen, D. Bell, D. Chipps. A semiclosed loop computer-assisted insulin infusion system. In The Medical journal of Australia, volume 141, pages 784–789, Australasian Medical Publishing Company Proprietary Limited, 1984. [6] S. Furler, E. Kraegen, R. Smallwood, D. Chisholm. Blood glucose control by intermittent loop closure in the basal mode: computer simulation studies with a diabetic model. In Diabetes Care, volume 8, pages 553–561, American Diabetes Association, 1985.